Call Now  (713) 227-4444 Email Us Hablamos
Español

Neal Davis Blog

  • About
    • Neal Davis
    • Tyler Brock
    • Andrew Jordan
    • Hiring An Attorney
  • Expertise
    • Criminal Defense
    • Sex Crime Defense
    • Child Pornography
    • Child Solicitation
    • Drug Possession
    • White Collar Crimes
    • Shoplifing/Theft
    • DWI
    • Murder Defense
    • Assault & Family Violence
    • Title IX Defense
  • Results
  • Reviews
  • Press
  • Resources
    • Blog
    • Criminal Defense Guides
    • Scholarships
Home / Firm News / And the Winner of the Neal Davis Law Scholarship Essay II Contest Winner Is…

And the Winner of the Neal Davis Law Scholarship Essay II Contest Winner Is…

January 31, 2018

scholarship essay II contest winner

While millions of Americans tuned into the 60th Annual Grammy Awards on January 28th, at the Neal Davis Law Firm we were busy pouring through the many great responses to our second scholarship essay contest, which centered around the following question:

“Do mandatory minimum sentences make the U.S. safer or more dangerous?”

In the end, 26% of applicants said they thought mandatory minimums kept us safe, while 74% believed they need to be repealed or updated.

Our winner, Sarah Roberts of Georgetown, Texas, is at freshman at Texas A&M University and plans to study Business. Her essay impressed us by diving into the ethics and morality of mandatory minimum sentencing policies, as well as the way Sarah incorporated specific case examples and citation to prove her argument.

Congrats Sarah on your $1,000 scholarship!

Check out her essay for yourself:


Do mandatory minimum sentences make the U.S. safer or more dangerous?

 

One can hardly hope to discuss the effectiveness of mandatory minimums without

stumbling into a discussion about ethics and morality. Mandatory minimums act as a bottom line,

which can be dangerous when something as fragile and elusive as justice is at stake. These

minimums are based on the assumption that all criminals of a certain crime are equally guilty and

come from equal circumstances. Mandatory minimums do not make the U.S. safer. Instead, they

are unnecessarily harsh, stand in the way of justice, and can damage community and family

health.

 

While it may sound reasonable to assume that standardized, harsh punishments prevent

crime, mandatory minimums do not adhere to this logic. As a study from The Sentencing Project

found, crime rates are not determined by the severity of the punishment, but the certainty¹,

indicating that harsh mandatory minimums are no more effective in reducing crime than a less

harsh, more just punishment. According to the Washington Post, after Attorney General Eric

Holder started his initiative to roll back mandatory minimum policies in 2013, crime rates fell,

which would not be the case if mandatory minimums were effective enough to justify their use².

Furthermore, the case of Sharanda Jones exemplifies how mandatory minimum sentencing can

get out of hand—she received a life sentence without parole after her first arrest for transporting

cocaine³. Her punishment is an example of the dangerous nature of mandatory minimums that

leads to circumstances (and justice) being neglected in trial.

 

Sharanda Jones’ trial also demonstrates how mandatory minimums, along with other

strict criminal justice policies, have a history of disproportionately affecting minorities. As

mentioned in the Academy Award-nominated documentary 13th, mandatory minimum sentences

for drug charges involving crack—the accused in such cases typically being black—were more

harsh than those involving cocaine, where the accused is typically white⁴. A study done by the

United States Sentencing Commission also found that black people were the most likely to have

been convicted with a mandatory minimum penalty from 1995 to 2016⁵. I would argue that a policy

being made into a weapon of mass incarceration against those of a certain race has no

place in the justice system and makes the U.S. more dangerous for minorities.

 

Needlessly imprisoning people for extended amounts of time due to mandatory

minimums also has a detrimental effect on family and community health. Imprisonment puts a

long-lasting and costly strain on the family of a convicted criminal⁶, especially if the convicted

has children or dependents. The mandatory minimum policy does not take into account these

circumstances, and even in a case where a more lenient sentence is appropriate for the trial at

hand, judges are not given the opportunity to exercise their best judgment and must give a

punishment that is too harsh.

 

The use of mandatory minimums indicates a distrust in the nation’s justice system to

adequately dole out fair punishments to accused criminals. I, however, have more faith in the

discretion of a judge—who has considered all details of a trial and the accused’s

circumstances—than an overarching rule that blindly assigns punishments. Because of the

prevalence of mandatory minimums, we are coming dangerously close to making injustice the

name of the game in the U.S.—a nation once known as the Land of the Free.

 

¹ Valerie Wright, “Deterrence in Criminal Justice: Evaluating Certainty vs. Severity of Punishment,” The Sentencing Project , Nov. 2010,
<https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Deterrence-in-Criminal-Justice.pdf>.

² Nancy Gertner and Chiraag Bains, “Mandatory minimum sentences are cruel and ineffective. Sessions wants them back,” Washington Post, 15 May 2017,
<https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/05/15/mandatory-minimum-sentences-are-cruel-and-ineffective-sessions-wants-them-back/?utm_term=.2e78897a20fd>.

³ Sari Horwitz, “From a first arrest to a life sentence,” Washington Post, 15 July 2015, <https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/07/15/from-a-first-arrest-to-a-life-sentence/?utm_term=.10ec0dac4830>.

⁴ 13th, Directed by Ava DuVernay, Netflix Original, 2016.

⁵ United States Sentencing Commission, “An Overview of Mandatory Minimum Penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System,” uscc.gov, July 2017, <https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-publications/research-publications/2017/20170711_Mand-Min.pdf>.

⁶ Megan Comfort, “‘A twenty-hour-a-day-job’: The impact of frequent low-level criminal justice involvement on family life,” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, May 2016, pp. 63-79, doi:10.1177/0002716215625038.


Are You the Next Scholarship Winner?

Do you want to win a $1,000 scholarship? Our third scholarship essay contest is now open for submissions. The deadline to answer the following question is August 24, 2018:

“Is more oversight of the FISA court needed? If so, what type of oversight do you suggest?”

Your answer must be between 500-750 words, and only one entry may be submitted per student. Entered essays will be judged within two weeks, and a winner will be selected. Additionally, notable entries will also be published on the Neal Davis Law website.

In order to be eligible for this scholarship, students must be a U.S. resident or resident alien and be registered at a U.S. college or university. Essays must be written by the scholarship applicant and be original to the contest. Essays may not have been written for a prior assignment.

Interested applicants may find more information on our scholarship contest page.

If you have additional questions about the contest, essay requirements or the selection process, feel free to contact us.

Good luck!

Related Resources

  • Ex-Texas Police Chief Convicted of Bribery, Mail Fraud
    Ex-Texas Police Chief Convicted of Bribery, Mail Fraud
  • Neal Davis Scholarship Winner: Largest Challenges to the Criminal Justice System
    Neal Davis Scholarship Winner: Largest Challenges to the…
  • Drug Trafficking Tops Federal Crime Sentencing
    Drug Trafficking Tops Federal Crime Sentencing
5-star review image
He handled my assault case
Assault  |  Houston
Assault case was dismissed
2014-01-02
"He's the best lawyer in Houston. [...] Thank you, Mr. Davis. "
I.A., Verified Customer
5-star review image
So thankful to have found him
Assault  |  Houston
Client's family violence case dismissed.
2014-12-05
"I've been around great attorneys, and you hire Neal if you want a great lawyer and gentleman. He ..."
Anonymous, Verified Customer
5-star review image
Felony case dismissed!
Assault  |  Houston
Dismissed assault case
2018-01-05
"In March of 2017 I was charged with a felony. However, Neal and Ty were able to sift through ..."
R.R., Verified Customer

Categories

  • Child Pornography & Online Solicitation
  • Community
  • Criminal Defense
  • Drug Crimes
  • Federal Crimes
  • Firm News
  • Intoxication Offenses
  • Sex Crimes
  • Violent Crimes
  • White Collar Crime

Search

Criminal Defense Court Process

FREE E-BOOK

Learn all about the legal process and your legal rights.

Get Your Free Copy Now

Board Certified, Criminal Law – Texas Board of Legal Specialization (2009-2021), AV Rated by Martindale Hubbell (2015), and listed as a Best Lawyer in America (2015-2022)

He doesn't give up, no matter what you're up against
M.F.
5-star review image
Got my life back
K.W.
5-star review image
Muy satisfechos con su trabajo
Tia de J.C.
5-star review image

Read All Reviews

    Contact Our Law Firm




    We respect your privacy. The use of this form does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

    Address
    Neal Davis Law Firm
    The Heights Boulevard Law Building
    1545 Heights Blvd., Suite 700
    Houston, TX 77008

    Map

    Call 24/7
    (713) 227-4444

    Office Hours
    Monday - Saturday
    8:00 AM to 6:00 PM

    Sunday: Closed


    Experienced Criminal Defense Law Firm in Texas

    While based in Houston, our law firm provides knowledgeable representation and comprehensive legal services for individuals throughout Texas, including:


    Location

    Harris County:

    Houston, Pasadena, Baytown

    Montgomery County:

    Conroe, The WoodlandsWillis, Pinehurst

    Fort Bend County:

    Sugar Land, Richmond, Needville, Cinco Ranch


    Your Houston Criminal Defense Lawyer: Neal Davis


    A principle of the American criminal justice system is that all defendants are "innocent until proven guilty." Houston criminal defense attorney Neal Davis and his skilled legal team represent individuals accused of committing crimes. For over 20 years, Neal Davis has successfully defended clients in Texas and federal courts in all types of criminal matters at all phases, from state misdemeanors to complex federal matters. Often, he has favorably resolved criminal cases quickly and quietly, without the need for trial.


    The Neal Davis Law Firm defends the rights of individuals charged with all types of state crimes, including drug offenses , child sex crimes, online solicitation of a minor , child pornography, DWI and intoxication manslaughter, fraud and theft, assault and family violence, and murder and homicide, as well as all types of federal crimes.


    Board Certified, Criminal Law – Texas Board of Legal Specialization. Serving all of counties and federal courts across Texas, including Harris County (Houston), Montgomery County (Conroe), Galveston County and Fort Bend County (Richmond). Enjuris Texas personal injury guide

    © 2023 Neal Davis Law Firm, PLLC. All rights reserved. Law Firm Online Marketing by SEO Advantage, Inc.


    Legal Information

    The information and materials on this website are provided for general informational purposes only, and are not intended to be legal advice. We attempt to provide quality information, but the law changes frequently, and varies from place to place. The information and materials provided are general in nature, and may not apply to a specific factual or legal circumstance. An attorney and client relationship should not be implied. Nothing on this website is intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney; therefore, if you require legal advice, please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Every case is different and individual results may vary depending on the facts of a case.