Do you know what your rights are if you’re arrested?
You should, because those rights can be violated by arresting officers, which might bolster your chances of getting a charge dropped or dismissed.
Also, knowing your rights can guide how you behave when you’re arrested — a vulnerable time when it’s best to say little, if anything.
First, you’ve no doubt heard of the “Miranda rights,” determined by a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case called Miranda vs. Arizona.
Those rights are proclaimed time after time by police officers in movies and on TV. As they say in the Miranda warning, “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to the presence of an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for you.”
Another often unmentioned Miranda right is this one:
Such rights should be proclaimed before any questioning by arresting officers. But an important distinction is that Miranda rights only have to be read when someone is arrested — thus, in custody — and law officers wish to question them.
Arrests can occur anywhere, from public sidewalks to a police station. The important distinction requiring Miranda rights to be read is that you must be held in custody where you are not free to go. If you’re not yet in custody, and thus not under arrest, Miranda rights don’t need to be read. Technically, a police can question you without them.
Of course, that doesn’t mean you can’t refuse to answer, whether you’ve heard your Miranda rights or not.
A trick police commonly play is to avoid arresting you but then questioning you anyway — without having to alert you to your right to remain silent or speak privately with an attorney. Police are only required to read your Miranda rights to you after you’ve been placed in custody.
If police have you in custody and don’t read your Miranda rights, your case will not necessarily be dismissed. Though your answers to police can’t be used against you in court, there may be enough other evidence to still prosecute you.
Along with your right to hear the Miranda warning in advance of questioning by police, you also have a right to cite the Fifth Amendment in refusing to answer their questions. That amendment to the U.S. Constitution grants you the right to avoid self-incrimination, or proclaiming yourself to be guilty.
Prosecutors may try to use this refusal against you, but rest assured it’s not an admission of guilt. It’s simply an assertion of your legal right to remain silent in the face of questioning about a crime.
You also have a right not to be subjected to physical or psychological coercion by police to get you to talk to them. Any evidence police get via a coerced statement is inadmissible.
You have some rights upon arrest to refuse giving bodily samples, such as in a breathalyzer test after a DWI traffic stop. In fact, under Texas law you can refuse a breathalyzer and blood test. But that same refusal could result in suspension of your driving privileges for 180 days if it’s your first DWI arrest.
The U.S. Supreme Court has gone further. It ruled in Maryland v. King that police could collect DNA samples at any time from persons arrested for serious crimes.
As for arrest warrants, you don’t have a right to avoid arrest, even if police lack a warrant. As long as police have “probable cause” to believe you’ve committed a crime, they can arrest you.
An exception is if you’re in your home, given the old adage: “A man’s home is his castle.” Then, an arrest warrant may be needed.
You also have legal rights when police seize and search your computer. In most cases, police must get a search warrant to do this. And even then, you have a legal right to refuse giving police passwords or other keys to unlock your devices, whether they’re computers or cell phones.
We hope we’ve cleared up some things you should know when wondering about your rights upon arrest. If you need that attorney the police say you can consult, contact the Neal Davis Law Firm. Our experienced Houston criminal defense attorneys can help you understand your constitutional rights during a free consultation.
" Neal represented our son and the case against him was dismissed, while other attorneys we consulted primarily focused on explaining their fees and pushed us to settle. Neal took time to understand our needs and truly appreciate our values and to convey to the Court, the District Attorney and the Judge the true essence of the case details and the circumstances of how our son was himself victimized, versus treating us as another case. He saw the case through to the utmost extent of the law, so our son, who is an honor student, was completely exonerated, and he made sure that support and professional help were in place during the experience. He declined the court's offer of a 2-year probation and pushed harder with the D.A. even though we had already paid him his fees. Most attorneys would have simply walked away at that point; however, Neal wasn't satisfied with the results and had the case reset since he knew it was not a fair result for my son. In the end, the case was dismissed. "
" Estamos muy satisfechos con su representacion en el caso de nuestro sobrino. Siempre obtuvimos respuestas a todas nuestras preguntas, y acceso a ustedes sin ningun problema. El caso se resolvio satisfactoriamente y en una forma muy rapida. Gracias!"
" Words cant express how grateful i am for having Neil on my side. I was involved in a police sting for online solicitation. When i though my life was over i contacted Neil. He told me he would do everything he could to get me out of my situation. He kept me up to date and answered when i called. In the end my case ended with a no bill and i can finally start living my life again."